|
In June 2011, following lengthy negotiations, the attorneys for Dennis Pittman, Shantell Mayo, Jamie Pittman, Patrick Kelly, Rebecca Pittman, Jimmie and Sheila Sones reached an agreement with Matt Bingham, the Smith County District Attorney. The terms of the agreement required each defendant to sign an affidavit and admit in court that he or she had harmed the children. In return, the District Attorney allowed to the defendants to plead to a charge of injury of a child with a sentence of time served. This agreement allowed the defendants to be released and does not require them to register as sex offenders.
Jamie Pittman, Patrick Kelly, Rebecca Pittman, Jimmie and Sheila Sones were released in June 2011. Shantell Mayo was released in November 2011. Dennis Pittman remains in prison, serving his life sentence, while awaiting the outcome of his appeal before the Tyler Court of Appeals.
The release of Mr. Pittman will put an end to these regrettable cases.
For those who might think that because the six individuals signed statements admitting to having caused injury to a child, consider their alternative. Each of them faced retrial before the same judge, the Hon. Jack Skeen, Jr. Each were forced to anticipate that Judge Skeen would continue to apply his own special "ad hoc rules," which the Houston Court of Appeals criticized as designed to help prosecutors secure convictions. Each faced the same prosecutor, Matt Bingham, determined to convict each one of them, evidence of their innocence notwithstanding. Each faced a certain conviction and life sentence from juries in a county saturated by local TV and newspaper coverage. Three of the individuals had been caged in the Smith County Jail for four years without trial, and faced possibly years more before receiving one. All six individuals realized that their appeals would not return to the Houston Court of Appeals, but would instead go to the Tyler Court of Appeals, which the local prosecutors love because the court so rarely reverses their cases. The six individuals, therefore, realized that they faced a choice between: (1) going to trial on principal with near certainty that they would end their lives in a maximum security unit, or (2) signing their names to a two-page statement and walking out of jail and prison to the waiting arms of the families, as free men and women. They correctly chose their freedom. |